음악산업진흥에관한법률위반
Defendant
A shall be acquitted.
[Supplementary part] The summary of the factory laboratory B is a person who operates "D" in Gangwon-si, Gangwon-do, and Defendant A is a person who operates a pay job placement office in the name of "E" in Gangwon-si, Gangwon-do.
2. No person who is a defendant shall provide fee job placement services without registering with the head of a Special Self-Governing Province or the head of a Si/Gun/Gu having jurisdiction over the location of the principal place of business;
Nevertheless, on June 2, 2017, the above Defendant introduced to B the fee-charging 00, under the condition that the Plaintiff would receive the fee of KRW 7,000 per unit of entertainment receptionist (1) per unit of entertainment receptionist (7,000) at the request of the above B, without being registered with the original mayor at around 21:00, the above Defendant provided a fee-charging job placement service.
Judgment
The facts charged in this case are as follows: (a) since the facts charged in this case were issued on June 16, 2017 and became final and conclusive on July 14, 2017, and is in a relationship between the facts charged in relation to the summary order of 1198 high-ranking High-ranking District Court Decision 2017 high-ranking 1198 high-ranking Branch Court, acquittal shall be pronounced pursuant to Article 326(1)