2. The fact that the defendant recognized the whole crime of late late and reflects the fact that the judgment was made in the first instance is favorable to the defendant.

However, the crime of this case is a situation unfavorable to the defendant, such as the defendant driving Oral bab while under the influence of alcohol without a driver's license and refusing police officers to comply with a legitimate request for a measurement of drinking, and the nature of the crime is bad, denying the charge of non-measurement of drinking from the investigative agency to the court below, denying the charge of non-compliance with the alcohol measurement from the investigative agency to the court below, and the

In full view of the above-mentioned normal relationship, the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, the circumstances surrounding each of the instant crimes, and circumstances revealed in the records and pleadings, it is not determined that the sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.