Control of coercion, intimidation, assault, injury, guns, swords, explosives, etc.

Violation of law

2015 early 319 Constitutional Tribunal

Seized evidence 1, 4, 6, 8 through 12 shall be confiscated.

판시 피해자 장○○, 이○○, 강$$에 대한 협박의 점 및 피해자 이△△, 송△△에 대한 폭행의 점에 관한 공소를 각 기각한다.

The request for adjudication on the constitutionality of the instant case is dismissed.

On April 11, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for one year and six months and three years of suspended execution on April 19, 2014 by the Daejeon District Court for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a crime of injury to a group, deadly weapon, etc.), and the judgment becomes final and conclusive on April 19, 201

The defendant is a person who has worked as a violence organization in the Daejeon District in the 1970s**** a person who has worked as a second part of the 1970s.

1. Violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (Intimidation against groups, deadly weapons, etc.);

A. From June 1, 2010 to August 2, 2010, the Defendant: (a) 11:00 on the date; (b) the Dong-gu Daejeon Metropolitan City* the Dong-gu of Daejeon * the Defendant’s dwelling room in the Defendant’s dwelling room in the Dong-gu (27 cm in total length and 16 cm in length) knife the knife knife, which is a deadly weapon; and (c) the head of the Tong, the Defendant O(nife, 48 years old) expressed the knife knif in the head of the Tong, “I want to far the knif in which I want to do so, because I want to far the knife in which I want to do so; and (d) made a speech and behavior that I want to inflict any harm on the victim’s life

B. At around 11:00 on November 201, 2010, the Defendant: (a) stated the victim’s head of the Dong-gu Daejeon Metropolitan City* the above victim’s head of the Dong-gu, Daejeon Metropolitan City* the above victim’s head of the defendant’s living room stated that the above victim would go to the Defendant; (b) stated him as a deadly weapon the knife knife knife of the above 1-A, which is a deadly weapon, and (c) stated the victim’s desire to “a knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knif.”

Accordingly, the defendant threatened the victim with a deadly weapon.

라. 피고인은 2012. 9. 일자불상 11:00경 대전광역시 동구 ** 에 있는 피고인의 주거지 마당에서 통장 육○○의 배우자인 피해자 임○○(여, 45세)가 피고인에게 붙들려 있던 위 육00를 데려가기 위하여 자동차 경적을 울리자 위 피해자에게 "내가 통장하고 얘길 하고 있는데 누가 와서 시끄럽게 하는 거야!"라고 소리치고, 계속하여 피해자가 육○○에게 화를 내는 모습을 본 후 피해자에게 "어디서 기집년이 큰 소리를 쳐! 확 죽여버릴라"라고 욕설을 하였고, 이에 피해자가 피고인에게 "남편에게 뭐라고 한 것인데 왜 아저씨가 나한테 큰 소리를 치는 거에요!"라고 말하자 그 곳에 놓여 있던 위험한 물건인 주먹 크기의 돌멩이를 손에 집어 든 채 피해자에게 던질 듯이 하며 "이런 썅년이 어디서 큰소리야! 확 찍어 죽여 버릴라!"라고 욕설을 하여 피해자의 생명, 신체에 마치 어떤 위해를 가할 듯한 언동을 하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and threatened the victim.

E. From the end of March 2014 to the beginning of April 11, 200 of the same year, the Defendant, a public official of the Dong Dong-dong Office, at the Dong-gu Daejeon Metropolitan City** Do Dong-dong office, “Do-dong, Do-dong, Do-dong, Do-dong, Do-dong, Do-dong, Do-dong, Do-dong, Do-dong, Do-dong, Do-dong, Do-dong, Do-dong, Do-dong, Do-dong, Do-dong Do-dong Do-dong, and Do-dong Do-dong Do-dong Do-do, Do-dong, Do-dong Do-do, Do-dong, Do-dong, Do-dong Do-do, Do-dong Do-do Do-do, Do-do Do-do, Do-do, Do-do Do-do Do-do Do-do Do-do Do Do-do Do-do Do-k...

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and threatened the victim.

바. 피고인은 2014. 9. 7. 22:00경 대전광역시 동구 ** 에 있는 한@@의 주거지 마당에서 제5항 기재와 같이 피해자 강$$(64세)과 몸싸움을 하고 난 다음, 화가 나 그 곳의 테이블 위에 놓여 있던 흉기인 과도(총 길이 20cm 가량)를 손에 든 채 위 피해자에게 "죽여버리겠다"고 말하여 피해자의 생명, 신체에 마치 어떤 위해를 가할 듯한 언동을 하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant threatened the victim with a deadly weapon.

사. 피고인은 2014. 9. 23. 15:00경 대전광역시 동구 **에 있는 피고인의 주거지에서 위 피해자 강$$이 피고인의 요구를 힘들어 하자 피해자에게 "야 이 개새끼야! 내가 너 죽이려면 쥐도 새도 모르게 죽여 새끼야! 우리 집에는 너 죽일 수 있는 물건은 수류탄 빼고 다 있어이 새끼야"라고 욕설을 한 후 그 곳의 안방에 있던 서랍에서 흉기인 톱니 칼(총 길이 29cm, 날 길이 17cm)을 꺼내어 든 채 피해자의 얼굴에 가져다 대며 "이봐 이 새끼야 죽고 싶은거냐?"고 욕설을 하고, 안방 침대를 가리키며 "저기 총도 있다 이 새끼야 봐라!"라고 말하며 침대 구석에 있던 모형라이터 총기의 총구를 보여 주는 방법으로 피해자의 생명, 신체에 마치 어떤 위해를 가할 듯한 언동을 하였다. 이로써 피고인은 흉기를 휴대하여 피해자를 협박하였다.

아. 피고인은 2014. 9. 24. 19:00경 대전광역시 동구 **에 있는 피고인의 주거지 현관에서 그 곳에 있던 흉기인 위 제1의 사항의 톱니칼을 든 채 피해자 강$$에게 "야이 씨팔놈아 나를 이렇게 만들어 놓고 너는 니 마누라랑 편히 다리 뻗고 자는 거냐? 내가 자면서 한 두번 생각하는 게 아니다 이 새끼야!"라고 욕설을 하고, 반지하에 있던 기름통을 가리키며 "저 기름을 니네 집에 다 부어 버리고 불 질러 버릴 꺼다! 그러면 니들은 살라고 나오겠지? 그러면 이 칼로 니네 배때지를 다 찔러 죽여버릴 거다!" 라고 욕설을 하여 피해자의 생명, 신체에 마치 어떤 위해를가할 듯한 언동을 하였다. 이로써 피고인은 흉기를 휴대하여 피해자를 협박하였다.

2. Forced;

A. On May 16, 201, the Defendant sent a phone to the victim on the ground that the ○○○○○, the head of the Tong, does not hear the Defendant’s horse, and led the victim to perform a non-obligatory act by having the victim resigned from the head of Dong where the walk walk walk walk walk walk walk walk walk walk walk walk walk walk walk walk walk walk walk walk walk, and walked the public official in his place on the 16th of the same month, and caused the victim to resign from the head of the Tong.

B. On July 2014, the defendant, around 10:30, at the end of the Daejeon Metropolitan City, Dong-gu*, Daejeon Metropolitan City * the defendant's residence, sent a telephone to the victim SongO (the 37 years of age) who is an employee of the Nonghyup branch of the Nonghyup Bank, and came to know in the course of carrying out the defendant's loan interest business, and called "Ikk kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn k kn kn kn kn kn? kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn.

D. On September 2014, the Defendant, at around 10:30, around the end of the Daejeon Metropolitan City, Dong-gu* in Daejeon Metropolitan City* in the same manner as described in subparagraph 2-b. of the above Article, the Defendant: (a) threatened the victim with the same method as described in subparagraph 2-B; (b) made the victim, who was fright, enter the Defendant’s residence, made the victim be in the Defendant’s dwelling; (c) provided the details of the card price and the receipt; and (d) caused the victim to perform an act without any obligation

E. On October 15, 2014, around 10:00, the Defendant: (a) threatened the victim’s forwarding ○○○ in the Dong-gu Daejeon Metropolitan City* using the same method as described in Article 2-2-2(b) in the Defendant’s residence; (b) ordered the victim to leave the Defendant’s residence; (c) to take charge of agricultural passbooks; and (d) to withdraw cash from the Defendant; and (e) ordered the victim to perform a non-obligatory act by allowing the Defendant to withdraw cash at the three thousand branch of the Nonghyup Bank and deliver it to the Defendant.

바. 피고인은 2014. 7.초순 일자불상 14:00경 대전광역시 동구 **에 있는 피고인의 주거지에서 피해자 김○○(47세), 피해자 배○○(40세)을 위 피고인의 주거지로 부른 후 위 피해자 김○○에게 "야 이 새끼야! 집안 청소 좀 해! 개밥도 줘!" 라고 욕설을 하여 피해자의 생명, 신체에 마치 어떤 위해를 가할 듯한 언동을 함으로써 이에 겁을 먹은 피해자들이 집 청소, 개밥 주기, 설거지, 개똥 치우기 등을 하여 피해자들로 하여금 의무 없는 일을 하게 하였다.

사, 피고인은 2014. 9. 16. 06:30경 대전광역시 동구 **에 있는 피고인의 주거지에서 피해자 강$$에게 전화를 걸어 "너 이 개새끼야, 여기 안 올라오고 뭐하고 자빠졌냐?"고 말하고, 이에 위 피해자가 피고인에게 '논, 밭 좀 둘러보고 있습니다'라고 말하자 피해자에게 "야 이 새끼야 니가 나를 이렇게 만들어 놓고 논, 밭을 둘러보러 다녀? 죽고 싶은 거 아녀? 빨리 우리집으로 올라와!"라고 욕설을 하고, 피고인의 주거지로 찾아온 피해자에게 "니가 나한테 이러면 안 되지, 이 미친 새끼가 죽여버릴까 보다!"라고 욕설을 하며 "야 이 새끼야! 내일부터는 아침에 일어나자마자 곧바로 올라와!" 라고 말하는 등 피해자를 협박하여 피해자로 하여금 같은 달 17.경부터 같은 달 26.까지 매일 아침 피고인의 주거지로 올라와 피고인에게 안부 인사를 하게 한 후 피고인의 목적지로 자동차를 운전하게 하였다.

3. Intimidation.

A. On January 21, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 19:00, the Daejeon Metropolitan City Dong-gu* △△△△△△△△ (59 years old); (b) the Defendant stated that the Defendant, a business owner in Lestop, “I am sto s to s to s to s to s to s to s to s to s to s to s to s to s to s to s to s to s to s to s to s to s to s to s to s to s to s to s to s to s to s to s to s to s to s to s to s to s to s to s to s to s to s to s to s to s to s to s to s to s to s to s to s to s to s to s to s to s to s to s to s to s to s to s to s to s to s to s to?

Accordingly, the defendant threatened the victim.

B. On April 2013, the Defendant took a 13:00 on April 2013, and made a speech and behavior that seems to inflict any danger and injury on the victim’s life and body by making the victim’s cell phone talking with the victim’s ○○○ (the age of 49) at the ward in the Dong-gu Daejeon Metropolitan City*, the Defendant’s dwelling place in the Daejeon Metropolitan City*, the victim’s cell.

Accordingly, the defendant threatened the victim.

C. On July 1, 2014, the Defendant: (a) 14:00 on July 1, 2014, and around 14:00 on the Defendant’s residence, the Dong-gu Daejeon Metropolitan City*, Dong-gu, the Daejeon-gu, the Daejeon-gu *, and (b) stated that the victim, who completed cleaning, i.e., as described in the above Section 2 (f) was f.h., f., f., and the said victim’s “h.h.?h., h.?h., h.?h., h.?h., h., h., h., h., h., h., h., h., h., h., h., h., h., h., h. to h., h., h., h. to h., h., h., h.k., h.

4. Violence;

On September 2013, at around 13:00 on the first day of the Daejeon Metropolitan City, Dong-gu, Daejeon Metropolitan City* on the ground that the defendant did not work in his residence * the victim's ○○○○○, the defendant expressed that "the fluor is living together with the fluor," and that the above fluor should be placed at a bad time for the defendant, and that the above fluor should be placed at the time when the fluor was bad for the defendant?" The defendant fluorddd the victim "whether fluoring the fluor of the fluor," and fluordd the victim on the fluoral and hand floor of the fluoral.

5. Bodily injury;

피고인은 2014. 9. 7. 22:00경 대전광역시 동구 **에 있는 한@@의 주거지 마당에서 피해자 강$$, 위 한@@과 술을 마시던 중 위 피해자가 술에 취하여 졸고 있자 선배가 이야기 하는데 졸고 있다는 이유로 피해자를 밀어 넘어뜨리고 주먹으로 위 피해자의 턱 부위를 수 회 때린 후 그 곳의 잔디밭에 피해자와 뒤엉켜 뒹구는 등으로 피해자에게 약 2주간의 치료를 요하는 경추부 염좌 등의 상해를 가하였다.

6. Violation of the Control of Firearms, Swords, Explosives, etc. Act;

No person shall possess guns, swords, explosives, gas sprayers, electroshock weapons, or crossbows without permission from the head of the competent police station.

Nevertheless, on November 2, 2014, the Defendant possessed, without permission of the chief of the police station having jurisdiction over the gas sprayers, 1 knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. 증인 강$$의 일부 법정진술

1. 강$$에 대한 경찰 피의자신문조서

1. 김○○, 육○○, 장○○, 강$$, 김△△, 육△△, 송○○, 임△△, 배○○, 임○○, 송△ A, 이△스, 최OO, 이00, 한@@에 대한 각 경찰 진술조서

1. A list of the bankbooks in the Dong/Dong;

1. Reports on internal investigation (No. 3 of the evidence list);

1. Request for cooperation in investigation (No. 19) and list of 112 reported cases (No. 20 of the evidence list);

1. Each investigation report (Evidence List 21, 22, 31, 32, 34, 36, 74) and each investigation report (Evidence List 53, 55, 57, 59, 61, 63, 65, 67, 70, 72, 83);

1. Each police seizure record and the list of seizure;

1. 피해자 장@@ 노트 메모 사진(증거목록 38번)

1. Reporting the occurrence of the case and arrest of the case (No. 73 of the evidence list);

1. A medical certificate of injury (No. 79 of evidence);

1. Application for coal (No. 81 in the evidence list);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of Daejeon District Court 2013 High Court 2362 (No. 84 of the evidence list) and one copy of the judgment (No. 85 of the evidence list);

1. Article applicable to criminal facts;

Articles 3(1) and 2(1)1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 324 of the Criminal Act, Article 324 of the Criminal Act, Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 283 of the Criminal Act, Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 71 subparag. 1 and Article 12(1) of the Control of Firearms, Swords, Explosives, etc. Act (the occupation of intimidation, the occupation of intimidation, the choice of imprisonment), Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 71 subparag. 1 and 12(1) of the Control of Firearms, Swords, Explosives

1. Handling concurrent crimes;

The latter part of Article 37 and Article 39(1) of the Criminal Act [mutual crimes, such as the crimes of subparagraphs 1 through 5, 2, 3-A, 2-B and 4, and the violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective, deadly weapons, etc.) for which judgment becomes final and conclusive]

1. Aggravation for concurrent crimes;

Articles 37 (former part), 38 (1) 2, and 50 of the Criminal Act

1. Discretionary mitigation;

Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act

1. Confiscation;

Many criminal records related to ○ violence on the grounds of sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Code, and significant part of the crime in this case during the period of probation.

Taking into account all the conditions of sentencing, such as the law of crime, form and poor quality of crime, attitude of the defendant's investigative agency and court, the defendant's refusal to punish some victims, equity in the case where the judgment was rendered at the same time as the judgment became final and conclusive, the motive and circumstance leading to the crime, and the age and health conditions of the defendant, by repeatedly committing a crime against many victims.

Public Prosecution Rejection Parts

1. Facts charged, intimidation

(1) 피고인은 2010. 4. 일자불상 11:00경 대전광역시 동구 **에 있는 피고인의 주거지 거실에서 피해자 장○○에게 자신의 깡패 인생 이야기를 하던 중 위 피해자가 피고인에게 가겠다고 말하자 피해자에게 "씹할 년, 육시랄 년, 좆같은 년"이라고 욕설을 하고, 그 곳에 있던 손가방에서 약병을 꺼내어 손에 든 채 "내가 욕하는 게 기분 나빠? 이런 씨팔년이 한번 신고 해봐! 니가 신고해서 경찰이 오는 순간 난 너 죽여버리고 그냥 이 약 먹고 빠이빠이 하면 되니까 한번 해봐 알겠냐!"라고 욕설을 하여 피해자의 생명, 신체에 마치 어떤 위해를 가할 듯한 언동을 하였다. 이로써 피고인은 피해자를 협박하였다.

(2) 피고인은 2010. 8. 일자불상 18:00경 대전광역시 동구 **에 있는 피해자 장○○ 운영의 '**식당'에서 위 피해자에게 "씹할 년, 육시랄 년, 좆같은 년"이라고 욕설을 하고, 소지하고 있던 손가방에서 약병을 꺼내어 손에 든 채 "내가 욕하는 게 기분 나빠? 이런 씨팔년이 한번 신고 해봐! 니가 신고해서 경찰이 오는 순간 난 너 죽여버리고 이약 먹고 빠이빠이 하면 되니깐!"이라고 욕설을 하여 피해자의 생명, 신체에 마치 어떤 위해를 가할 듯한 언동을 하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant threatened the victim.

(3) 피고인은 2011. 5. 초순경 불상지에서 대청동사무소장인 피해자 이○○(50세)에게 전화를 걸어 수회에 걸쳐 "장@@ 통장을 사임시켜라"라고 말을 하고, 계속하여 같은 달 16. 11:00경 대전광역시 동구 세천동에 있는 대청동사무소에서 위 피해자에게 "너 이 새끼야 제대로 하지 않으면 가만 안 둬!"라고 욕설을하여 피해자의 생명, 신체에 마치 어떤 위해를 가할 듯한 언동을 하였다. 이로써 피고인은 피해자를 협박하였다.

(4) 피고인은 2014. 9. 15. 13:30경 대전광역시 동구 **에 있는 '**' 식당 주차장에서 피해자 강$$이 같은 달 7.경 피고인에게 상해를 가하였다는 이유로 무릎을 꿇은 채 피고인에게 사과를 하던 피해자에게 "니가 감히 나한테 이럴 수 있냐? 너 같은 새끼는 내 말 한마디면 쥐도 새도 모르게 전라도에서 올라오고 서울에서 내려와서 몰살시킬 수 있다! 니 가족까지 싸그리 몰살시킬 수 있다!"라고 욕설을 하여 피해자의 생명, 신체에 마치 어떤 위해를 가할 듯한 언동을 하였다. 이로써 피고인은 피해자를 협박하였다.

(b) Violence;

(1) On August 2014, the Defendant recommended the victim △△△△△△ (60 years of age) (hereinafter referred to as the “victim”), who had been drinking in the Dong-gu, Daejeon Metropolitan City**** in the Dong-gu, Daejeon, on the end of the end of the day of August, 2014, who had been drinking in the said convenience store for drinking alcohol, followed the said victim’s drinking. The victim, who was drinking in the said place after drinking alcohol, her hand, her flabs and her flab, brought the victim’s arms out of the entrance, her flab and her flab, and her flab by taking the victim’s arms out of the entrance, and her flab, she sawd the victim at one time by taking the victim’s flab.

(2) On September 1, 2014, the Defendant: (a) 18:00 on the first day of the Daejeon Metropolitan City, Daejeon *** Schlage’s △△△△△△△ (55 years old), which was seated on the cream in the area, called “ how she will do so, several maris, kis, and so on”; and (b) the Defendant stated that “Is the Defendant “Is the fe that you will see? Is the feas? Is the feas? Is the feas? Is the feas? Is the feas? Is the feas? Is the knish of the victim’s face on the back, and then Is the victim’s seat on the back, so I can see that Is the knisher’s knish and kick the victim’s knish by spreading it to the victim’s left.”

2. Determination

Each part of the facts charged is a crime falling under Article 283(1) or 260(1) of the Criminal Act, which is a crime of anti-dumping decision-making under Article 283(3) or 260(3) of the Criminal Act. Since it is apparent in the record that the head of ○○, ○○, ○○, Dops, Haaks, and Song △△△△△△△ intended to punish the accused after filing a public prosecution, this part of the charges charged is dismissed in accordance with Article 327(6)

Judgment on the motion for Adjudication on unconstitutionality of Law

1. Summary of application;

Articles 3(1) and 2(1)1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, which are the premise of the instant case, punishs the act of carrying a deadly weapon of the same content as that of Article 284 of the Criminal Act without stipulating any separate aggravated constituent elements other than the constituent elements of Article 284 of the Criminal Act. However, the statutory punishment is aggravated. As to the same act of intimidation carrying a deadly weapon, Article 284 of the Criminal Act applies, and Articles 3(1) and 2(1)1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act are assigned to the prosecutor’s voluntary choice. As such, the application of the Act and its contents are contrary to the principle of equality under the Constitution and the basic principles of the Constitution guaranteeing human dignity and value.

2. Determination

On the other hand, the issue of how to punish a certain crime, i.e., the selection of the type and scope of statutory penalty, requires broad legislative discretion, and readily concluding that a crime is unconstitutional. Articles 3(1) and 2(1)1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act provide that a person who commits a crime by carrying a deadly weapon or other dangerous articles shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not less than one year for a person who commits a crime of intimidation is subject to such freedom of legislative formation. Such provision goes against the constitutional ideology, such as the principle of excessive prohibition, the right to equality, and the basic principles guaranteeing human dignity and value.

3. Conclusion

If so, the motion for adjudication on the constitutionality of the case is without merit, it shall be dismissed.