However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant operated an officetel sexual traffic business establishment in the name of "C Multilater" in the Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Btel 814.

On September 12, 2017, the Defendant, at around 18:00, waiting the instant officetel to D, a female employee, and arranged sexual traffic by having D receive the price for sexual traffic with D and sexual intercourse from the F who reported public relations writing at the Internet website “E” and received 80,00 won, from September 5, 2017 to September 12, 2017, by allowing D to receive the price for sexual traffic from an unspecified number of men and to provide sexual intercourse.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspects of D;

1. A copy of the monthly note, receipt, or passbook of the real estate (officetel);

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Mediation, etc. of elective sexual traffic for facts constituting an offense and Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Etc. of Arranging Punishment

1. The act of arranging sexual traffic for the reason of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (a favorable circumstances among the reasons for sentencing) requires the strict eradication of such act as the act of arranging sexual traffic is not likely to undermine the sound sexual culture and good morals by commercializing the female sex. Considering that the Defendant’s act of arranging sexual traffic by employing a female sexual traffic, advertising a sexual traffic business establishment using an Internet site, leasing an officetel as a place of sexual traffic, etc., the Defendant’s liability is not less than those against the Defendant’s act of arranging sexual traffic by taking into account the following circumstances:

However, in light of the fact that the defendant committed the crime of this case and reflects the mistake, that the defendant did not have any criminal record exceeding the same criminal record or fine, and that there is no other criminal record, the defendant's age, sexual conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime of this case, and all the conditions of sentencing as stated in the records and theories of changes, such as the circumstances after the crime, etc., the punishment shall be