When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of urban buses belonging to C companies.

On June 4, 2019, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at the speed of 11:15, while proceeding at the speed of the west of the west, the intersection of the west road located at the west of the luminous at the speed of luminous at the speed of the west between two lanes and two lanes.

Since there is a signal light and crosswalk installed, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents by safely driving the motor vehicle in accordance with the traffic signals through a safe operation of the steering and steering system.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and caused the victim's front wheels of the victim D(70 years old) who crosses the crosswalk to the port from the right side of the direction of the defendant's walk by the negligence of carrying the red signal in contravention of the signal. The victim got off the road by taking the front wheels of the victim D(70 years old) who crosses the crosswalk to the right side of the vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as a pelpelus, which requires approximately six weeks of medical treatment due to occupational negligence as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements of D;

1. A traffic accident report (1) (2);

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the 1st vehicle fluor video images of the accident;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (1) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the relevant criminal facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and the

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. There are various conditions for sentencing, such as the Defendant’s erroneous recognition of his/her mistake, the Defendant’s primary agreement with the victim, the primary crime, the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, motive and consequence of the crime, etc., even though the Defendant was in violation of a signal signal of the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.