beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.01.26 2016나62849

손해배상

Text

1. The plaintiff's incidental appeal and the defendant's appeal are all dismissed.

2. Costs arising from an appeal and an incidental appeal shall be respectively.

Reasons

1. The plaintiff and the defendant alleged in the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance, and the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance are recognized as legitimate even if the defendant examined each evidence submitted in the court of first instance to the court of first instance, based on the evidence submitted in the court of first instance.

Therefore, the court's reasoning of this case is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, the court's reasoning is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act

2. According to the conclusion, the first instance judgment is just, and all incidental appeals by the plaintiff and the defendant are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.