2. In light of the records, the lower court’s sentencing seems reasonable in full view of the following circumstances: (a) the size of the Defendant’s painting facilities and the period of unreported operation; (b) the amount of fines on summary order; (c) the amount of fines on the summary order; (d) the amount of fines has been reduced due to the Defendant’s reporting of air emission facilities at the lower court’s stage; and (e) the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, background leading to the

3. Thus, the defendant's argument is without merit, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.