except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is the representative of the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd. in both weeks.

The Defendant, at the Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu D management office as of January 11, 2019, intended to revise and submit the capital requirements of the Defendant’s company to comply with the “public notice on the selection of the recycling goods collection company” in response to the tender of the “public notice on the selection of the recycling goods collection company” to submit the contract for the collection of recycled goods.

1. Around January 16, 2019, the Defendant altered public document: (a) had access to the KCAC office to a computer Internet-based dispute resolution office; (b) had printed out the above paper to a file by printing it into the file; and (c) had the total number of shares to be issued using an irregular computer program from “480,000 shares” to “960,000 shares; and (d) had the total number of shares issued using an irregular computer program from “120,000 shares” to “240,000 shares”; and (b) had the amount of shares issued to “60,000,000 won” to “1,20,000,000 won” to “60,000 won.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the defendant altered one copy of the corporate register in the name of the National Court Administration Information Central Control Office.

2. In response to the bid “Public Notice of Selection of Recycled Goods Collection Business” by the D Management Office, the Defendant registered a file which can be stored in the copy of the corporate registry of a multi-family housing management information system in the E site, and exercised it by the employees in charge of being aware of the altered situation, as if the file was duly completed, as stated in paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. A written accusation;

1. Application of the amended certified transcript of the register of this case;

1. Article 225 of the Criminal Act, Articles 229 and 225 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The Criminal Act, the suspension of execution;