상해
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
An application filed by an applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.
1. On February 2, 2013, at around 15:10 on February 2, 2013, the Defendant: (a) requested the victim B (27 years of age) who is the manager of the said building in the fourth floor of the building in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan City to link the said building’s publicity log to each floor; and (b) the victim was able to dupe and dupe only part of the front section of the building, and the victim was able to dupe and dupe the victim’s knicked the key to the hand
2. The facts charged in this part of the judgment are crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent pursuant to Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act. Since the victim expressed his/her wish not to punish the defendant on July 1, 2013, which was after the prosecution of the instant case, the prosecution of the instant case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the victim’s application for compensation order is dismissed pursuant to Article 32(1)2 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings on the ground that