However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 12:40 on March 9, 2013, the Defendant: (a) neglected the duty of care to prevent the loss of forest fire by burning wastes to the surrounding areas, etc.; (b) neglected the duty of care to prevent the loss of forest fire in the event of burning wastes, while extinguishing agricultural and industrial wastes using a single-use coverter at that place; and (c) destroyed the fire to the surrounding forests and fields owned by others, (d) approximately 97,231 square meters of forest land in C, D, and E, which are owned by others, by the Defendant.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes to a survey report on actual condition, an old map of a forest fire damaged area, a standing timber planting protocol, and a photograph at the scene of a forest

1. Article 53 (4) of the Forest Protection Act applicable to criminal facts and Article 53 (4) of the Election Protection Act;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act for the reason that suspended execution is above the extent of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the favorable circumstances such as the confession of and reflect against the crime by the defendant, the full agreement between the victim and the victim, and the punishment by a fine in 191, other than the fact that