3. On July 2016, the Defendant, who forged a private document and carried out the said investigation document, opened a branch of the Franchisy Office in C, Chuncheon. The fact is that the Defendant’s pro-Japanese G, who works in the said office, is established as a guarantor and is given a loan to the Defendant’s friendly G, a certificate of seal impression, etc., despite the need for a certificate of personal seal impression, etc., on October 19, 2016, requires an employee’s certificate to recruit investors, and the certificate of personal seal impression and the certificate of seal impression are also issued from G to prove the need for a certificate.

On October 19, 2016, the Defendant drafted an investment contract between the Defendant and the SKpppppppppher, as described in paragraph (2), at the above SKpppp's office, and entered “G (H), Gangwon-do City I, Chuncheon I,******, and J” in the column, and was in the name of the said G.

G’s seal was affixed.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged one copy of the investment contract in the name of G, which is a private document on rights and obligations, and exercised it by presenting it to the above F, who is aware of the forgery at the same time and at the same place.

4. The Defendant, as mentioned in the preceding paragraph, has custody of a certificate of personal seal impression and a certificate of personal seal impression in the name of G, and the fact that the Defendant did not have obtained consent or approval from G to enter G on the money consumption lending and borrowing contract process certificate for an investment contract between the Defendant and SK PppppppppppppppppppppppppP as a joint guarantor. However, the Defendant prepared a certificate of the money consumption lending and lending contract process certificate with G as a joint guarantor and put himself/herself for delivery to the above SK limited

On October 21, 2016, the defendant is a notary public at the office of notary public in Chuncheon-si K.