When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant is the Chief of the Mannam-gun C.

On March 22, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 22, 2016, at the Seok-gun, Seok-gun, Seocheon-gun, the 127 Blish-gun, the Blish-gun, the electorate, D, E, and F, who failed to understand the intent of the abode polling, due to old age, and was not a “person subject to the abode polling,” who is unable to move due to a serious physical disability; (b) without his/her consent, voluntarily prepared the abode polling report in their names, and filed a report on his/her residence voting by affixing his/her seal thereon.

As a result, the defendant entered D, E, or F in the list of abode voters or falsely conducted abode polling by means of fraud.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D, F, and E;

1. Three copies of the abode polling report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the abode polling list;

1. Relevant provisions of the Act and Article 247 (1) of the Public Official Election Act concerning criminal facts and the selection of punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act (limited to concurrent crimes with punishment prescribed in the crime of violation of the Public Official Election Act due to false or false abodes and Countermeasures against D, the largest number of concurrent crimes);

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. Scope of applicable sentences under law: Fines not exceeding 7.5 million won;

2. The sentencing criteria are not set for a crime of violating the Public Official Election Act due to false sentencing guidelines, and the sentence shall be determined immediately without applying the sentencing criteria; and

It is necessary to strictly punish electors in that they can distort their will because they are true voting to voters who know well the meaning of voting due to a brush or a disease.

However, the defendant.