When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. On May 12, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 20:30 on May 12, 2015, at the “cafeteria operated by the victim C” in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the Defendant: (b) committed an act as if he/she would have paid the price by placing an order for the murder of a brut insertion and the bruing

However, there was no intention or ability to pay the price from the beginning.

The Defendant, from the injured party, was provided with 7 parts containing a 108,000 won or more of the market price and 5 bottles per share, and did not pay the price.

As a result, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received property equivalent to the market price of KRW 108,00.

2. The Defendant, on the grounds that the victim C demanded payment of the food at the date, time, place, and place under the preceding paragraph, insultingly insulting the victim by referring to “the victim as a bit of bitch, bitch of bitch, bitch of bitch,” well-known and well-known to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A complaint;

1. Application of the receipt statute

1. Article 347(1) and Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning the relevant criminal facts, the choice of punishment, and the choice of fines;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;