However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Around 18:40 on April 24, 2016, the Defendant, at C cafeteria located in C cafeteria B, had drinking alcohol with a name influence, and the victim D (60 years of age) controlled the Defendant, and the victim D (60 years of age) took the Defendant. The victim’s head head was fluence ( approximately 1m in length and studs material) that is a dangerous object in front of the said cafeteria, and the victim was fluenced with the victim’s head one time with a stick which is a dangerous object in front of the said cafeteria. Around 18:40 weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs (influences of victims and criminal implements);

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Although probation, community service, or order to attend a lecture has not been restored to the existence of several times of violent crimes for the reason of sentencing under Article 62-2 (1) of the Criminal Act, the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant;