2.Provided, That the execution of the above sentence shall be postponed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On December 10, 2014, at around 03:15, the Defendant: (a) expressed a defect that the Defendant, under the influence of alcohol, destroyed their flags, and assaulted the flag on the front side of the Sinnam-si B, and received a report from C, 112, and sent out by the Defendant, the Defendant expressed a defective desire to hear the circumstances of the instant case from the Defendant; (b) took the flag on the right-hand upper part of the said E on his hand, flag, and f on one time as drinking the breast part of the said F.

The Defendant continued to capture the Defendant as a flagrant offender committing obstruction of performance of official duties by drinking the border G and Ha, who belongs to the same district unit, with the face of the above G one time, and pluck up and assaulted the left shoulder part of the above H.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers related to the handling of 112 reported duties and the arrest of flagrant offenders as above, and at the same time, the Defendant placed a shoulder box, etc. requiring approximately two weeks medical treatment to the above E, and put the said G at the left-hand box where the treatment period cannot be known to the above G.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

2. Each police statement of C, F, G, and H;

3. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act as to the facts of crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act;

2. Article 40 and Article 50 of the Criminal Act, the choice of sentence, and the choice of imprisonment.

3. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) reflects criminal conduct and there is no other criminal

4. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;