However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On February 15, 2014, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, on the grounds that the police officer, at the above head of the police station, at around 23:30 on February 15, 2014, and the police officer D, who was called upon 112, prevented the Defendant from committing the Defendant’s assault against E, i.e., the police officer, who was called upon 112, at the Guro Police Station C District, at the police officer’s seat twice in drinking, and the police officer’s head was three times in drinking, and interfered with the police officer’

2. Around February 16, 2014, at the criminal office of the Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Police Station located in Guro-gu, 02:35 on February 16, 2014, the Defendant insultd the victim F, who is a police officer to restrain the Defendant from smoking. The Defendant publicly insultd the victim in accordance with the same son, who is a police officer in charge of preventing the Defendant from smoking. The son’s mother, her mother, her mother, her mother, her mother, her mother, and her mother, and the son and her mother, who is considered to be a woman, shall be considered to be a man. The son shall be considered to be a man. In accordance with the same son. The victim publicly insulting the victim by speaking as a Chewing flachi, her woman, or her woman,

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness E, D, F, and G;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on witness H’s legal statement;

1. Relevant Articles 136(1) and 311 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. It does not reflect the fact that the reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act is not recognized, while it is an initial crime and an contingent crime committed in the state of detention, and other various circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing as shown in the records, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, occupation and family environment, shall be determined as ordered by the text.