If the Defendants did not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Defendant

A is a person who operates "F Health Center", and Defendant B is a person who operates a cafeteria "G", and is a couple between husband and wife.

1. On July 29, 2016, from around 16:50 on the same day to around 17:30 on the same day, Defendant A provided that, in the G restaurant located in Daejeon Seo-gu, Daejeon, the wife B used 7.60,000 won of the F riverine revenue, Defendant A used the head by misunderstanding that the wife B used the F riverine revenue of KRW 7.60,000,000, and used the head by the dispute team, Defendant A used the head by assaulting the head, and the fact of the market price in which the water reservoir, the water reservoir, the dispute team, the table, and the chair was collected on the restaurant floor was damaged by the market price of KRW 220,00,000,000 at the time of the investigation. However, the victim was at the time of the police station’s investigation, while the victim collected the goods at the place of contact with the third party’s hand because it was not loaded.

“The 78th page of the evidence record”). The damaged property appears to include the damaged person’s damage. As such, the damaged amount can be acknowledged as the market price as the above.

In order to damage the property of the victim, ask the victim's left hand to stop the loss, etc., the victim suffered bodily injury that requires medical treatment for a period of 21 days due to 21 days due to scam and scambling, scam and tensions, scamines and tensions, multi-scamines, 3 hand-on decks on the left side, and scams.

2. Although Defendant B stated in the above date, at the same place as above, that the facts charged against A’s assault and was on the table, “fluorial canter” was stated as “fluorial canter.” However, when Defendant B’s police investigation conducted by the police, it was deemed that Defendant B was “fluorous canter

There is no essential difference in the 7th page of the evidence record) and the above is recognized without any changes in the indictment, since there is no essential difference in the marries of the crime.

In response to the Ethma of the victim A, the victim was suffering from injury that requires treatment for 21 days, such as impairment of the character of face, strawing, strawing, timbering, and pedagoging of the face.

Summary of Evidence

Defendant

A

1. Legal statement of the witness B;

1. Photographss of the damaged scene and multi-friendly fingers;