However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On October 16, 2012, around 00:35, the Defendant: (a) committed assault, such as, on the street, the Defendant: (b) “Der in Gwanak-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, by the value of the business owner and goods of the above Schlage; (c) and (d) the slopeF belonging to the Seoul Gwanak Police Station E-gu Seoul, Seoul, which was dispatched after receiving the report of 112, expressed a bath, “F was punished by imprisonment for franchis and franchis.” (e.g., the franchis, the franchis of F’s hand, and the f’s chest by hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of official duties by police officers on crime control.

2. The Defendant damaged public goods at a time and place as referred to in paragraph (1) at the same time and place as that referred to in paragraph (1). The Defendant damaged public goods by cutting the patrol car (No. 12) on board and the back of the driver’s seat, so that the police officers are cut down to drink and shouldered.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement concerning F;

1. Application of statutes on photographs of damage;

1. Relevant Article 136(1) and Article 141(1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for the sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act [the decision of the type of the obstruction of performance of official duties] - June of the obstruction of performance of official duties - one year and four months [the scope of recommendations] - one year and four months [the disposition of multiple crimes] are considered [the decision of the sentence] at the lower limit of the punishment for the crime for which no sentencing guidelines have been set. The defendant has been sentenced to a suspended sentence of imprisonment, a fine for several times in relation to violence, etc., but again again committed the crime of this case. The circumstances favorable that the damage from the crime of this case is not completely recovered: the damage itself is relatively minor, and the defendant is bound for a period of up to one month and will not repeat again.