However, the sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. From October 21, 2017 to October 23:40 on October 22, 2017, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate business affairs of the victim for about 40 minutes, such as drinking out from the E convenience store located outside Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, which is operated by the victim C (V, 67 years of age) during the period from October 22, 2017 to October 22, 2017.

2. "2018 Highest 603".

A. From the H convenience point of October 13, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 07:44, at the victim G (n, 23 years of age) working in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the Defendant continued to display the victim’s disease, which was a dangerous object that the injured person purchased by bruting the brut, for the reason that she does not grant free of charge the paper cup, which is the sold goods; (b) when the injured person was bruted by the injured person, the injured person’s brush of the injured person’s brush; and (c) when the injured person collected other brut soldiers possessed by the Defendant, the injured person continued to display the injured person.

In this respect, the defendant carried dangerous objects and assaulted the victim.

B. The Defendant, on October 13, 2017, at around 08:25, the second floor of the commercial building where the H convenience store as indicated in the paragraph (a) was located, was “low-speaking year” to the victim of the victim and the matrine.

per is a father-child.

“The victim’s face is expressed as “ and the victim’s face is taken several times.”

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim.

(c)

Defendant interfering with his/her duties, visiting H convenience points on October 13, 2017, around 07:30, around 08:25, around 11:30, around 12:00, and around 13:30, over a total of five times for about six hours;

(a)and (b) as mentioned in paragraphs (a) and (b), assault the victim or the victim “ponman gymnum”;

혓바닥 계속 놀리면 혓바닥 잘라 버린다.

“In doing the same bath as “,” the victim was unable to perform his/her duties, such as having the victim contact with other customers and arranging sales.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's convenience store management by force.

Summary of Evidence

[2018 Highest 420]

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. C. The witness;