2. The judgment of the court below is contrary to the recognition of the crime of this case, and it is recognized that the defendant agreed with the victim, and that the defendant committed the crime of this case in contingency under the influence of alcohol, but the defendant has been punished for the same kind of crime, and the defendant committed the crime of this case at the same time during the repeated crime period. The crime of this case is causing bodily injury to the victim with a saw, which is a dangerous article, and the crime of this case is not proper in light of the circumstances and method of the crime, the degree of injury to the victim, and the statutory punishment of the crime of violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective deadly weapon, etc.) is three or more years, and the punishment of the court below sentenced by the court below is the maximum punishment of the defendant, and it is not unfair in full view of all circumstances, including the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, family relationship, motive, means and result of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.