상해
The defendant shall be innocent.
1. On May 21, 2015, the Defendant: (a) sent the victim D’s front glass to his money transaction at the G Apartment-si apartment parking lot in Gyeonggi-si; (b) sent the victim D’s money transaction; (c) the Defendant’s return from the vehicle to the said victim’s vehicle; (d) the victim’s home gets away from the E apartment parking lot in Yang-si, thereby driving away the said victim from the vehicle; and (c) took the victim’s her house to drive away from the E apartment parking lot in both cases; and (d) took the victim’s blick at one time after her head knife, her head knife, etc.; and (d) inflicted an injury on the victim, such as dives and tensions of the bones of the bones, her head knife, etc., requiring approximately three weeks of medical treatment.
2. As evidence consistent with the facts charged in the instant case, there is a statement by the victim and an injury diagnosis letter against the victim.
In other words, the victim was assaulted by the defendant at around 01:45 to 02:15 on May 21, 2015, as stated in the facts charged at the investigative agency.
In this court, the defendant, after coming from his car, went away from his car, brought about a driver's vehicle to his apartment parking lot, and brought about the driver's flick, and subsequently sexual assaulted himself.
was stated.
However, in full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, it is difficult to believe the victim’s above statement as it is, and it is insufficient to recognize the fact that the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim by assaulting the victim as stated in the facts charged, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it otherwise.
A. On May 22, 2015, the date following the instant case, the victim left the Defendant’s car at around 16:00, and “on the day of the low-income bracket.”
A police officer called a "fluence to police" and reported to 112 by a taxi engineer F in the nearest taxi stops at the time. However, the police officer did not assault the victim at the time. Rather, the victim did not assault the defendant.