However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On October 2, 2014, at around 23:28, the Defendant driven C rocketing car under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.103% without obtaining a driver’s license from a section of about 200 meters from the front of the main point of view and people, to the front of the Seocheon-si Seoul Metropolitan City Municipal Ordinance, and from the front road of the Seocheon-si, 1-ro, 200 meters from the front of the main point of view.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The circumstantial statement of the employee;

1. Report on the situation of running a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol;

1. Inquiry into the result of the crackdown on drinking driving;

1. Application of the statutes on the register of driver's licenses;

1. Relevant provisions of Article 148-2 (2) 1, and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting a crime (the point of a sound driving) and subparagraph 1 of Article 152 of the Road Traffic Act and Articles 152 and 43 of the Road Traffic Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution ( normal consideration of the reasons for the suspension of execution);

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, including probation, community service, and order to attend a lecture, despite the fact that the defendant had been punished for the same kind of drinking driving on several occasions, has committed the crime of this case, and the nature of the crime is heavy.

However, the execution of imprisonment shall be suspended only once in consideration of the fact that the defendant reflects the crime of this case and again is expected not to drive under the influence of alcohol.