However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On October 23, 2009, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1.5 million by the Seoul Northern District Court as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act.

On October 02, 2019, at around 00:44, the Defendant driven C SP car in the state of alcohol alcohol concentration of approximately 0.187% from the section of approximately 200 meters, from the front of a cafeteria located in the Guri-si, Siri-si, Siri-si, to the front of the same city B.

Accordingly, the defendant violated Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act not less than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the state of driving under the influence of alcohol, and inquiry into the results of the control of drinking driving;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to criminal records, etc. inquiry reports (A) and investigation reports (verification of the same type of power);

1. Relevant Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act is that the defendant again commits the crime of this case even if he had a previous conviction of the same kind, taking into account the time interval with the same kind of crime, the defendant's blood alcohol concentration, the age, character and conduct and environment of the defendant, the motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., and the conditions of sentencing specified in the arguments of this case, such as the circumstances after the crime