If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

1. On February 21, 2015, around 21:00, the injured Defendant: (a) went away from the “E” operated by the Victim D (M, 56 years of age) located in the Seoul Central and Seomjin-gu Seoul Central District; (b) attempted to take a job without paying alcoholic beverages after drinking alcohol; and (c) was subject to restraint from the Victim D and F.

Accordingly, the Defendant, by plucking and plucking up the victim D's fingers, brought about the right side of the 2-day water surface where the victim D's fingers need to be treated for about two weeks.

2. The Defendant injured by negligence caused the victim F by plucking, plucking and digging up D’s fingers at the date and time, at the place specified in paragraph 1, and causing the victim F to suffer from the right side of approximately two weeks of the right side, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement with respect to witness D and F;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police suspect against D or F;

1. An investigation report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to documentary evidence and photographs;

1. Relevant Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of injury), Article 266(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of injury caused by negligence) and the choice of each fine concerning the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which is the order of provisional payment

1. The summary of the facts charged is as follows: (a) the Defendant laid the flowers on the floor at a time and place specified in paragraph (1) of the judgment; and (b) caused the son F to protruding to the floor, thereby causing approximately two weeks of treatment to the victim F.

2. According to the records, although the defendant was located on the floor and was found to have the victim F in the strike, it is recognized that D and the victim F only worked on the match floor and stated that the defendant was not the victim F. In light of the fact that the defendant was not the victim F. In light of the fact that the defendant had the victim's intentional or negligent intention with respect to the victim F.

It is difficult to recognize it.

Therefore, this part.