2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. On July 5, 2008, the Plaintiff, a foreigner of Pakistanan nationality, entered the Republic of Korea as a non-professional employment (E-9-1) visa and stayed in excess of March 7, 2014, the expiration date of his/her stay, and filed an application for refugee status with the Defendant on February 25, 2015.

B. On March 2, 2015, the Defendant issued a notification of refugee status refusal (hereinafter “instant disposition”) to the Plaintiff on the ground that there is a well-founded fear that the Plaintiff would be subject to persecution, which is a requirement of refugee under Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees and Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees.

C. The Plaintiff appealed and filed an objection with the Minister of Justice, but the said application was dismissed on September 24, 2015.

Facts that there is no dispute over the basis of recognition, Gap evidence 1, 2, Eul evidence 3, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff's assertion was made by intimidation's 2,00 dollars at the time when he visited Pakistan around September 20, 2009. The plaintiff's assertion was made by intimidation, and around October 25, 2013, the plaintiff, who appears to be the lebane's lebane's lebane, and found the plaintiff and his lebane's lebane's lebane shop operated by the plaintiff and his lebane's lebane's lebane's lebite and threatened them. The plaintiff's assertion was likely to murder the lebane's lebane's lebane's lebite's lebane's lebane's leb

(b) Entry in the attached Form of relevant Acts and subordinate statutes;

C. In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by comprehensively taking account of the respective descriptions of evidence Nos. 1 through 3 and the purport of the entire pleadings, it is difficult to view that the Plaintiff has “a well-founded fear of persecution on the grounds of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group, or political opinion,” even if all evidence and arguments submitted by the Plaintiff were considered, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

① The Plaintiff