난민불인정결정취소
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. Details of the disposition;
A. The plaintiff is well-known.
A foreigner of the nationality of the Republic of Korea (hereinafter referred to as the "Korea"), who entered the Republic of Korea on February 20, 2017, with the status of stay C-3 (short-term Visit).
B. On March 10, 2017, the Plaintiff filed an application for recognition of refugee status with the Defendant, but on April 17, 2017, the Defendant rendered a disposition for recognition of refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) to the Plaintiff on the ground that it is difficult to recognize “the well-founded fear of persecution” as prescribed by Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee Convention”) and Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee Protocol”) and Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee Protocol”).
C. On June 23, 2017, the Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice against the instant disposition. However, the Minister of Justice dismissed the Plaintiff’s objection on the same ground as on March 21, 2018.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2, and the purport of whole pleadings
2. The assertion and judgment
A. The plaintiff's assertion is well-known.
The Kingdom of B worked as Ryal Gard.
However, on November 27, 2016
In the process of attacking the king of the Kingdom of B, many Ryal Gards were killed.
The plaintiff at the time is well-known.
In order to report the occurrence of an attack by the government forces, the military of the Republic of Korea escaped, and thereafter, the military of the Republic of Korea went to the Republic of Korea.
The plaintiff is the Republic of Korea of U.S.
If you will return to Korea, it is still friendly.
Government is likely to pose a threat to life or physical freedom.
Nevertheless, the disposition of this case which rejected the Plaintiff’s application for refugee status should be revoked as it is unlawful.
B. Article 2 Subparag. 1 of the Refugee Act provides that a person who is a member of a particular social group of refugees is a race, religion, nationality, or political person or a member of a particular social group.