beta
(영문) 전주지방법원 2018.11.09 2017나13765

손해배상(의)

Text

1. The plaintiffs' appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the judgment of the court of first instance except for the part added as set forth in the following paragraph (2). Thus, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2.In addition, in Part VII, the following shall be added to the decision of the first instance.

â…………§ The Plaintiffs asserted that the deceased suffered bodily injury and died due to the negligence of the instant facility, but there is insufficient evidence to acknowledge that the instant accident occurred due to the reasons alleged in the Plaintiffs, while there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.â…………………§ 8 and 9 merely on the ground that the instant accident occurred due to the negligence of the instant facility, since the deceased did not go beyond what occurred in the ward of the instant facility, and the deceased alone went to the toilet of the instant facility.â…………………§).

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is justified, and the plaintiffs' appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.