When seized gallon, one stamped A (SM-T385K) (YM-T385 K) is 20 pressured branch offices of the Chuncheon District Public Prosecutor's Office.

[Presumption of Facts] The organization of telephone financing fraud (hereinafter referred to as "scaming") is to make a loan to an unspecified number of persons who suffered damage by misrepresenting a telephone without permission against an unspecified number of persons who suffered damage, thereby misrepresenting the financial institution and making a loan.

The role of the telephone finance fraud organization is to deceiving a victim by means of money transfer or withdrawal and transfer in the name of the loan repayment, etc. and to obtain money from the victim. The role of the telephone finance fraud organization is to share the role of the victim by means of “general responsibilities” in charge of organic communication between the point organizations, “ Call Center” in which the victim calls, “management responsibilities” in which the victim instructs the victim to withdraw the money deposited into the account, and “management responsibilities” in which the victim instructs the victim to commit specific crimes with “comburg”, “collection measures” in which the victim directly receives money, “delivery measures” in which the victim receives money from the victim and delivers money to the collection book, “transfer measures” in exchange for the money transferred to a foreign country, and “transfer measures” in preparation for arresting the victim. It is operated in the form of an occupation organization.

Around August 7, 2020, the Defendant applied for other loans by using the personal information of another person in this designated account, as the breach of a contract, even if the victim had already been under a pre-existing loan to a large number of unspecified persons, with a personal name named “B,” “C,” “D,” etc., which was known to the victim by reporting and communicating the high-profit arb on the Internet around August 7, 2020. In addition, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victims by means of a breach of a contract; and (b) as if the victims were employees of a financial institution, the Defendant was given cash in the name of the victims in return for a loan; and (c) transferred money by using the personal information of another person.