The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff, including the part arising from the supplementary participation.

After compiling the adopted evidence, the lower court acknowledged the facts as stated in its reasoning. The lower court determined that the Plaintiff merely received money from the Defendant Intervenor (hereinafter “ Intervenor Company”) on the ground that the Plaintiff carried out business activities for normalization of the G Group in accordance with P’s instructions, and that it does not constitute a worker under the Labor Standards Act, since it is difficult to view that the Plaintiff provided labor to the Intervenor Company in a subordinate relationship for the purpose

Examining the records in light of the relevant legal principles, the above determination by the court below is just, and contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, it did not err in finding facts against logical and empirical rules, incomplete deliberation, violation of the rules of evidence, and violation of

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed, and the costs of appeal are assessed against the losing party. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.