On January 3, 2009, the Defendant promised to marry with the victim-and-child job offering B who had attended at the time at the time at the Daegu-gu Incheon-dong bus terminal, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, and concluded that “It is not good for the Defendant to conduct construction business. It is urgently necessary for the Defendant to use cash as business funds if he/she lends money.”

However, the defendant did not have a mind to marry with the victim, and even if he borrowed money from the victim with a debt equivalent to KRW 700 million at the time, he did not have an intention or ability to repay it normally.

Nevertheless, as above, the Defendant, as well as by deceiving the victim as above, received KRW 2 million from the victim in cash on the same day, from that time until June 13, 201, acquired a total of KRW 93,080,250 from the victim on a total of 179 occasions, such as the list of crimes in the attached Table, from June 13, 201.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. Protocol of the police statement concerning B;

1. A written complaint;

1. Certificates of deposit transactions;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Taking into account the relevant statutory provisions on criminal facts and the grounds for sentencing under Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act that have a large number of criminal records against the defendant for the reasons for sentencing of punishment, the amount of damage in this case reaches approximately KRW 93 million, and the fact that no specific measures have been taken to recover from damage up to the present time, a sentence identical to the order shall be imposed on the defendant, taking into account the factors for sentencing favorable to the confession of the defendant committed by an investigative agency.