beta
(영문) 청주지방법원 제천지원 2013.04.16 2012고정96

폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)

Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 1,000,00, and by a fine of KRW 500,000.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 1, 2012, at around 02:00, the Defendant committed the Defendant’s crime with G and H, and at around 02:0, in a female toilet located in Jacheon City I, G, without any reason, by misapprehending that the victim C (n, 26 years of age) took a bath to himself/herself without any reason, “I were to be designated, spath, spath, spath,” and the victim’s head was spawd with his/her hand with his/her hand, h was spawd with his/her head with his/her hand at a time when the victim’s head was spawd by drinking, and Defendant A was spawd with his/her head with his/her head with his/her hand at a time when he/she was spawd, and Defendant A was spawd one time to enter the victim B (25 years of age).

As a result, the defendant jointly with G and H, caused the victim C to suffer about three weeks of medical treatment, such as a multi-faced divesia, etc., which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment, and the left-hand dives of the victim B, etc.

2. Defendant C and Defendant B’s co-principal defendants oppose the above assault at the same time and place as set forth in paragraph (1). Defendant C was charged with the face of the victim A (28 years old) who saw the victim G (the victim 27 years old) as a kh hand hand hand with the wheels of the victim G, and Defendant B was charged with the victim A (the victim 28 years old) who saw it as drinking. However, according to the witness’s statement in the third protocol and the witness H’s statement in the fourth protocol of the trial, Defendant B was found to have taken the victim A for drinking only once according to the witness’s statement in the third protocol of the trial and the witness H’s statement in the fourth protocol, so it is recognized that this part of the facts charged is reduced and recognized, but since there is a little change in the form of criminal act, it is not guilty of this part of the reason.

In addition, the Defendants jointly carried out the injury to Defendant G, such as cerebral cerebrovas, which is not known in detail for about two weeks of treatment, and the injury to the victim A, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment.

(i) the evidence;