beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.01.25 2016고단8505

특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치상)등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 8,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 31, 2016, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol level of 0.180% from blood transfusion around 01:25 on August 31, 2016, operated a BAD car and proceeded with Samsung Station on the side of the front line of the modern department store of Gangnam-gu, Seoul, as the fourth-lane road of 511-ro 51-ro.

In this case, the defendant who drives a motor vehicle has a duty of care to take the front side and properly manipulate the brake system and prevent the accident in advance.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected the above duty of care and failed to properly operate the brake system in the front bank by negligence, and caused the part of the back part of the D taxi driven by the victim C while stopping in the front bank, which was driven by the defendant, to be the front part of the F taxi driven by the defendant, and due to its shock, the victim E, who was parked in the front of the f taxi driven by the victim E, who was driving in the front of the f taxi.

Ultimately, the Defendant driven the said car in a state where normal driving is difficult due to influence of drinking, and suffered injury to the victim C, such as a full-time fladrating fladrat, etc., which requires a five-day medical treatment, and the victim E, such as light fladrum, tension, etc., which requires a two-day medical treatment.

2. The Defendant was under the influence of alcohol level of 0.180% during the day set forth in paragraph (1) of this Article, and driven a B-A-D car at the section of approximately 1km from the front of a main station in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Troro 511, to the front of his department store, on which it is impossible to find out the trade name located in the reverse Tri-dong in Gangnam-gu, Seoul, Seoul, while under the influence of alcohol level of 0.180%.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement of the occurrence of each traffic accident prepared by E and C;

1. The report on traffic accidents (the actual survey report);