A. As to the motor vehicle listed in the annexed Table 1 against the Plaintiff (Appointed Party):

B. Attached 2.2 to the Selection B

(a) The facts subsequent to the facts of recognition do not conflict between the parties, or may be recognized by taking into account each entry in Gap evidence 2 to 6 (including branch numbers, if any) and the whole purport of the pleadings;

1) Plaintiff (Appointed Party, hereinafter “Plaintiff A”)

) The designated persons (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiffs”) and the designated persons (hereinafter referred to as “designated persons”);

(1) The Defendant Company: (a) purchased the vehicle at its own expense, and thereafter, (b) registered the business under the name of the Plaintiffs on the date stated in the column for the registration of the business operator at issue; (c) around that time, the title of the registration of the ownership of the vehicle purchased at the expense of the Plaintiffs between the Defendant Company and the Defendant Company, which is the trucking transport business operator; (d) the Plaintiff is entrusted with the operation and management right of each of the instant vehicles by the Defendant Company to pay various expenses, such as monthly management expenses, taxes and public charges for each month, deductible contributions, general insurance contributions, etc., to the Defendant Company

(1) On October 20, 1998, the Plaintiffs, as of the date of the Plaintiff’s business registration No. 1 [Attachment 1], completed the registration of transfer of ownership in the name of each of the vehicles listed in the “vehicle” column (hereinafter “each of the vehicles of this case”) in the separate sheet No. 3 C on June 1, 1998, as of October 20, 199, as of the date of the Plaintiff’s business registration, and completed the registration of transfer of ownership in the name of each of the above vehicles listed in the separate sheet No. 4D No. 5 E on May 7, 2001, as of September 4, 2009, Annex No. 5 E on April 10, 2002, Annex No. 6 of the separate sheet No. 6 on April 8, 1999, pursuant to the above entrusted management contract of this case.

3 The Plaintiffs expressed to the Defendant Company the intent to terminate the instant consignment management contract by serving a duplicate of the instant complaint on the Defendant Company, and the said duplicate was served on November 5, 2014.

B. The Plaintiffs are determined to enter into the instant consignment management contract.