If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

On January 6, 2014, the defendant was under a divorce lawsuit with the wife B, and B attached 30 million won to the defendant's claim for the return of the lease deposit by the decision of the High Court of Jung-gu District Court on January 6, 2014 on the ground of the claim for division of property against the defendant.

1. On March 31, 2014, the Defendant: (a) at the office of a licensed real estate agent located in Gyeyang-gu Seoyang-gu Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu; (b) without authority, without authority, made a certified judicial scrivener enter the name B in the application for cancellation of provisional seizure against claims; (c) the proxy; (d) the receipt certificate holder; and (e) affixed the seal imprint of B in advance; and (e) forged the application for cancellation of provisional seizure against claims, the power of attorney; (d) the receipt certificate holder; and (e) forged the application for cancellation of provisional seizure against claims, the receipt certificate holder; and (e) submitted it to the person in charge of Goyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu,

2. On April 1, 2014, the Defendant, using forged documents submitted at the Goyang Branch Branch of the District Court as referred to in paragraph 1, ordered the cancellation of the provisional seizure, thereby acquiring pecuniary profits corresponding thereto.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police protocol of statement C and B to the Act

1. Relevant Article 231 of the Criminal Act, Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act, and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. In light of the following: (a) there is no special criminal record on the grounds of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act; (b) the Defendant’s wife was to receive consolation money from the Defendant’s wife in the divorce lawsuit; and (c) the confession and reflect of the instant crime, etc., the punishment is ordered as set forth in the Disposition.