However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Around 03:00 on October 7, 2012, the Defendant ordered the Victim F, who operates EM points at the DPacking Center located in Busan-gu, Busan-gu, to the victim F, the Defendant ordered the Victim F to do so.

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay the above drinking value, etc.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, received alcoholic beverages, etc. equivalent to KRW 250,00 at the market price from the victim.

2. Around 04:20 on October 7, 2012, the Defendant threatened the victim F (F) who was arrested as a flagrant offender and was under investigation because he did not pay the alcohol value as described in paragraph (1) at the H district district of the Busan Urban Police Station located in the Busan Urban Police Station G in the Busan Urban Police Station, and thereby was arrested as a flagrant offender. The Defendant threatened the victim F (F, 58 years of age) by stating that “I will live for three months, once again.”

3. Around 04:50 on October 7, 2012, the Defendant damaged an article for public use by generating a table of a consignee, who was a public object in a district zone, due to the fact that he was investigated at the H District District District as described in paragraph 2 of the same Article, the Defendant damaged the article for public use in a way that the amount equivalent to KRW 240,00,000, for the repair cost.

4. The Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender on suspicion of fraud, etc., and received an investigation of the suspect, and the Defendant was believed to have been investigated by pretended that he was the birth of the Defendant in order to conceal the fact that is the state of fine collection.

At around 03:20 on October 7, 2012, the Defendant arrested a flagrant offender as a fraudulent flagrant offender, and the Defendant stated “I” in the column of confirmation of confirmation that “I” and submitted the Defendant’s unmanned seal to the police officer, who knows that the signature recorded in the confirmation document was genuine, and submitted it to the police officer, who knows that the forgery was completed, to file the investigation records.”

In this respect.