E, a director of the D Company, used mobile phone Kakao Stockholm on November 2015, and used this work for the delay of the said work, “A person in the column of Technical Director (hereinafter referred to as “victim F”) used to waive the work.”

The technical director in the process of carrying out the construction has started with the interference of human funeral construction.

The material was used as the material indicated in the specifications, but the material was demanded to be changed from the beginning.

In addition, I argued the monthly ticket that they will play the role of supervision, forced low-income audience to execute construction in their own way, and eventually increase the air and construction costs.

At the last time, it was required to set an urgent amount of air at a high level and to recognize it when demanding to use the company he knows as the contractor.

In addition, the other partner's demand for wage and material cost of the cooperation company is problematic, and it was forced to cause private person in the request for direct payment, and it started to pay the money in his own mind.

1. The Defendant prepared a letter containing the phrase “,” and transmitted it to the Defendant.

On November 22, 2015, the Defendant, using a mobile phone at his own home, applied to G, H, I, J, K, K, L, M, N,O, etc., which is an occupant of the said apartment, to the Kakao Stockholm Stockholm, and copied the above contents received from E and delivered them to the said occupant.

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by exposing public facts through information and communication networks with a view to slandering the victim.

2. Defendant’s assertion and judgment

A. At the time of the Defendant’s assertion, the Defendant asserted the instant apartment for the public interest of the occupants of the instant apartment.