2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. On October 17, 2011, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with the Defendant, who is engaged in the business of broadcasting business, cultural service business, production of broadcast programs, etc., on which the Defendant agreed to lease the comprehensive photographic tyres on the land, B, and 16, Jung-gu, Incheon (hereinafter “instant tyres”).

From October 17, 201 to October 16, 2012 under the instant lease agreement, the original Defendant: (a) the lease period was from October 17, 201 to October 16, 201; (b) the rent of KRW 99,500,00 per month; (c) the first three-month portion (excluding value-added tax) was paid in advance; (d) the rent of KRW 298,50,000 (excluding value-added tax) was paid in advance; (e) the fourth month ( January 17, 2012) was paid in advance; and (e) the electricity fee was determined to be settled by the Plaintiff and claimed against the Defendant; and (e) the Plaintiff agreed that the instant Pidio cannot be leased to another person during the contract period,

(hereinafter “instant lease agreement”). B.

Zones A consisting of the instant Switzerland A, B, and B, which are classified into Zone B and Annex B, which are composed of the instant Switzerland A and B.

C. On March 2, 2012, the Plaintiff sent a public notice to the Defendant on March 2, 2012, stating that “The Defendant was unable to organize the instant Switzerland and did not pay electricity to the Plaintiff.” The Plaintiff appears to be the horse of the Defendant’s production, which was taken from the Csteteis at that time. Following his shooting, the Plaintiff sent a public notice stating that “after his shooting, the Plaintiff would cancel the lease agreement on the Csteisis from among the steiso, and request the Defendant to renew the contract with the exception of the Csteiso,” and on March 30, 2012, that “The instant lease agreement shall be deemed to have been maintained because the Defendant did not respond to the foregoing public notice, and urge the Plaintiff to pay unpaid rent.”

Accordingly, on April 2, 2012, the Defendant revoked the instant lease agreement, but exceptionally, until the completion and reorganization of “C” is completed.