2. If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

At around 02:30 on July 19, 2014, the Defendant asserted with others at the front of the “C” restaurant located in Seosan City, Seosan-si, and refused to request identification from the victim E (Nam, South, and 44 years old) who is an assistant belonging to the D District Unit of the Seosan Police Station, which was called “this flap, the police officer, must dint the flae of the public, why the flab of the fe should grow,” and displayed the victim’s flab, which led to the victim’s face, flabing and flabing the victim’s flab, and pushed the victim’s chest.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers with regard to the 112 reported handling duties, and at the same time, the Defendant abandonmented the 4 balance of 10-day medical treatment to the victim for about 10 days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each statement made by the police officer in relation to E and F;

1. Application of each of the Acts and subordinate statutes described in each investigation report and reply report;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes (Punishment on which the punishment is heavier than that of an injury);

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for the order of provisional payment [Incompetence] and one time (fluent circumstances] of violence and one time (fluent circumstances] (fluence) of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, a contingency, serious reflectence, minor injury, a smooth agreement with the victim and a considerable amount of deposit;