If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On August 2012, 2012, the Defendant prepared a complaint against C using a computer network protocol with the aim of having C receive criminal punishment in the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Office B office.

The statement of the complaint "A, who is the defendant, seems to be able to think that the complainant would purchase the vehicle under his name, and the copy of the resident registration and the certificate of the personal seal impression are assigned to the complainant, and by using it, a request for punishment for forging a motor vehicle sales contract in the name of the complainant when purchasing the vehicle under the complainant's name without the complainant's consent," and the defendant accepted not only that C agrees to prepare a contract for the secondary sale and purchase of the vehicle under the name of the defendant, but also that the defendant should receive a loan of KRW 9 million in the name of the defendant.

Nevertheless, at around 15:00 on May 9, 2012, the defendant submitted the above complaint to the public official in charge at the public service center of the Suwon District Public Prosecutor's Office, and brought the complaint C without delay.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect by the prosecution against the accused and C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on a complaint, a sales contract for used cars and a contract for installment financing;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 156 of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 157, 153, and 55 (1) 6 of the Criminal Act mitigated by law;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.