2. The plaintiff's remaining claims are dismissed.

3. The costs of the lawsuit.

A. According to the respective statements in Gap evidence Nos. 1, 3, 4, 6, and 9, and the witness Eul's testimony and arguments, in relation to the fire pipeline construction of the "C" project implemented in Saudi Arabia, the plaintiff agreed to supply the necessary equipment and materials for the above construction (hereinafter "the instant agreement"), around 2014, with the defendant who was awarded a subcontract for the above construction work, and then supplied the defendant with the equipment and materials equivalent to the supply price of 1,532,285 SAR (hereinafter "the instant price") equivalent to the supply price (hereinafter "the instant materials").

[Defendant asserted that the English name of the person who supplied the material of this case is different from that of the plaintiff as the person who supplied the material of this case other than the plaintiff. However, the defendant did not submit counter-written evidence to reverse the above recognition. Rather, the above facts are as follows: (a) the Korean Commercial Bank of Saudi Arabia (NCB) stated the English name of the deposit certificates in relation to the same account (number D), one of which is different from that of the plaintiff's employees, and one of which is different from that of the other's name tag used by B and the agreement of this case; (b) the defendant's request for the payment of the price of this case is consistent with the defendant's mark on the check issued by the plaintiff to the plaintiff's side; and (c) the defendant's request for the payment of the price of this case to the defendant, other than the plaintiff, the defendant's submission of the above evidence is not accepted as the plaintiff's assertion to the defendant as the above.