폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등상해)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
[2013 Highest 114]
1. Around 16:00 on December 8, 2012, the Defendant: (a) was driving a vehicle of amburged from the Dol-to-Saro Dol-to-Saro in Pyeongtaek-si in Pyeongtaek-si; (b) the victim D attempted a conversation to resist the Defendant’s comb driving; and (c) the Defendant refused the conversation and proceeded with the said vehicle as it is.
The Defendant got knee knee of the victim’s right knee in the front of the Defendant’s vehicle, which is a dangerous object, and faced with the victim’s right knee in the front of the vehicle, and caused the victim’s injury, such as a labing on a bridge, which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment.
2. On January 9, 2013, at around 11:55, the Defendant was driving the vehicles listed in the Home Pusler Scers set forth in the above paragraph 1. from the home flusium located in Pyeongtaek-si, Bupyeong-gu, Eup, and the Defendant refused the conversation and proceeded with the said vehicle as the victim E attempted to resist the Defendant’s sckless driving.
The Defendant received the victim from the front part of the foregoing vehicle, which is a dangerous object, with the front part of the vehicle, and proceeded about 5 kilometers from the front part of the above vehicle to the inside part of Pyeongtaek-si in the front part of the above vehicle, with the victim's repair from the front part of the above vehicle, and caused the victim to suffer from the above vehicle in the course of driving the vehicle from the three distance inside Pyeongtaek-si in Pyeongtaek-si, thereby getting off the victim from the above vehicle, thereby causing injury to the victim, such as acute cerebrs, which requires treatment for about 2 weeks.
[2013 Highest 264]
3. At around 12:00 on November 25, 2012, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s office business affairs by force, such as (i) planting waste to the front of the above office, and (ii) throwing waste and coaling away from the price issues related to other work in front of the H office site in the operation of the victim GF, and (iii) throw away waste and coaling in front of the above office site.
4. The Defendant, at the time and place set forth in the above 3.3. The Defendant, using a direct wall attached to the above office’s gate, changed from the talue fraud, changed from the talue, the Corporation’s weak, and the conscience.