명예훼손
The defendant shall be innocent.
1. The summary of the facts charged in this case is the head of the commercial building management group in the building in Namyang-si.
On August 14, 2009, the Defendant had approximately 48-58 owners of commercial buildings in the Namyang-si B building in the Namyang-si, Namyang-si, 2017, and ① the details of the passbook C Bank passbook that was terminated and withdrawn in cash on September 14, 2009.
On September 14, 2009, the account was terminated after the full amount of cash was withdrawn, and the special repair allowances, athletes management expenses, management expenses, management expenses, and the balance of the directly collected management expenses of the commercial building of this case was deposited.
Defendant D shipped 19,094,574 won without permission.
Therefore, Defendant D’s 19,094,574, which was withdrawn on September 14, 2009, came to gain undue benefits without legal cause.
As reference, the second investigation is in progress at the Speaker's Subdivision as of December 2016.
(2) From January 1, 2008 to November 29, 2016, the amount of undue profits from bulletin board usage fees shall be KRW 11,556,00 in total.
Parking proceeds, parking non-cash proceeds, and illegal profits from bulletin board costs are the total sum of 419,735,320 won from January 1, 2008 to November 29, 2016.
This should be attributed to the Plaintiff from the beginning of the City Party, but it was directly received by the Defendants, and it was unfair by refusing to return at present.
③ The representative director of Defendant E, who is the representative director, has the honor to claim and collect the personnel expenses of seven persons as if he were to work in the actual building even though he did not work in the actual building.
In addition, D is well aware of this fact.
The amount of unjust benefits in collusion by the Defendants is KRW 132,00,000.
④ Since Defendant D was elected as the president of the Defendant prosperity in around 2006, he maintained the position of the president of the prosperity conference as if he was the representative of the management unit of the commercial building, he did so without permission, such as collecting various management expenses and executing them without permission.
⑤ On August 1, 2009, Defendant D entrusted with the management of the instant commercial building and performed various management expenses while managing the instant commercial building.