절도등
All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal asserted that the Defendant’s punishment against the lower court is too unreasonable, while the prosecutor appealeded to the effect that it is too unfasible and unfair.
2. The amount of damage caused by the Defendant’s criminal act appears to be relatively minor, and some of the damaged goods were returned.
On the other hand, the Defendant committed the larceny at least two months after having been sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for the same crime, and did not agree with the victims.
In addition, comprehensively taking into account the sentencing conditions specified in the instant case, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, motive, means and consequence of the commission of the crime, the circumstances after the commission of the crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment is only within the reasonable scope of discretion and is too heavy or light.
It is difficult to see it.
Therefore, we cannot accept all the defendant and prosecutor's argument.
3. In conclusion, since each appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.