2. The judgment of the court below is that the defendant 2,00,00 won was wing up to the order of the defendant, and the court below deposited 2,00,000 won for the victims, and the defendant committed the crime of this case, which was committed more seriously against his mistake. However, the defendant has been punished several times, such as the violation of the Road Traffic Act and the violation of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving). The defendant committed the crime of this case during the suspension period of the execution of imprisonment sentenced to the violation of the Road Traffic Act, which was sentenced as the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act. The defendant did not reach an agreement with the victims, and the victim D wanted that the defendant be punished for severe punishment. The crime of this case was committed by mandatory insurance without the defendant's purchase of the blood alcohol concentration of 0.221%, which caused injury to the victims while driving a cargo in the state of the influence that normal driving of 0.21% is difficult, and the victim's D vehicle was owned by the victim and damaged it, and the defendant's age and circumstances, etc.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.