2. The judgment of the Defendant is a favorable condition to the Defendant, for example, that the Defendant has committed a misunderstanding against the Defendant through confinement life between approximately six months, and that the victim C and L agreed with the victim C and C, and that the victim C wanted to take the Defendant’s wife in the trial.

However, in full view of the following circumstances: (a) the sum of the damages in this case was about KRW 25 million; (b) the number of offenses in this case was committed against several victims during a considerable period of time; (c) the number of offenses in this case was extremely poor; and (d) the victims suffered from mental distress; (b) the defendant was punished for the same offense; and (c) the result of the application of the sentencing guidelines by the Sentencing Commission of the Supreme Court [the scope of recommendations: (a) the period of imprisonment: (b) the period between one year to two years; (c) the period between two years and six months; and (d) the period of application of the sentencing guidelines by the Sentencing Commission of the Supreme Court (a) and the defendant’s age, character and behavior, environment, background, means and consequence of the crimes; and (b) the conditions of the sentencing as shown in the records and arguments, it cannot be deemed that the sentence imposed by the

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.