If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On September 12, 2014, at least 20:45 on September 20, 2014, the Defendant stated that the train guidance broadcast was not well known at the 2nd-line service room of Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Hongdong-dong 165, and that he was sent to the Defendant after having received 112 report that he was unable to move to the Defendant, and then sought an explanation of the situation of the Gyeong-gu, Seoul Mapo Police Station B District B, which was called out by the customer, and then returned to the Defendant’s house. He expressed to the Defendant that he would turn back to her house. He must come to son, such as fright, bitch, bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch son.

Accordingly, the Defendant, who was born out of the service office, interfered with the legitimate execution of duties in relation to the handling of the 112 Report by a police official, who was taken two times of the face of C in drinking, i.e., “Chewing gue, several years of age,” and ii).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police protocol law to C

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act are as follows, and the sentencing conditions as shown in the instant pleadings, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, and environment, shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account all the factors indicated in the instant pleadings.

The Defendant recognized all of the instant crimes and is in profoundly against the Defendant.

B. On October 22, 1996, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine on the charge of violating the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act at the Seoul Central District Court on the charge of two occasions.

C. It did not focus on the degree of assault against police officers, and the Defendant selected a fine in consideration of the fact that there was no record of punishment for obstruction of performance of official duties in the past.