When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

[criminal power] On January 2, 2008, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 1 million for the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act from the Daegu District Court and the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 3 million for the same crime from the same court on March 28, 2008.

【Criminal Facts】

At around 23:30 on July 2, 2020, the Defendant driven a Fursom car with a blood alcohol concentration of about 0.178% in the section of about 2 km from the road adjacent to C in Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Seoul to the front road located in D, the same Gu, and violated Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act at least twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the result of crackdown on drinking driving and on the circumstantial statement of a drinking driver;

1. Previous convictions as indicated in the judgment: Relevant provisions of the Acts and subordinate statutes concerning criminal records and investigation reports; 1. Application of the same Act and Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2009Da14468, Jan. 1, 200; Decision 200Do414, Feb. 1, 2009; Decision 200

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;