When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On February 5, 2015, at around 03:55, the Defendant: (a) arrested three other persons, F, and F, and the other three persons of F, F, and F, as a flagrant offender in the assault case, and obstructed the driver’s seat of the defective patrol vehicle who tried to board the patrol vehicle; (b) prevented the Defendant from carrying the Defendant’s behavior from getting off from the vehicle; and (c) obstructed the Defendant’s behavior at the vehicle, and assaulted the Defendant by carrying a gun f, in his hand, of the said E’s flick, and flick, “I flick, flick, flick, and flick, flick,” and flick the flick of the flat.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the control of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police interrogation protocol concerning G and F;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of the Criminal Address Act and the Investigation Report Act

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the degree of violence and the degree of obstruction of performance of official duties is not severe, and there are no criminal records specifically punished other than fines on two occasions, and the age, environment, etc. of defendants are comprehensively taken into account);

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;