However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

around 16:25 on July 25, 2017, at the entrance of the front park of Jeju, the Defendant expressed that “any male is under the influence of alcohol” was demanded to return home from the slope E belonging to the Jeju-dong Police Station D District of the Jeju-dong Police Station, the Defendant called “Isk kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of police officers' duties concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of police statement protocol to E;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The extent of assault against public officials with reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, the fact that the defendant has been punished for the same offense, and other circumstances constituting the conditions for sentencing, such as the defendant's age, environment, and circumstances after the crime, shall be determined in accordance with the order;