공무집행방해
The defendant is not guilty. The summary of this judgment shall be announced publicly.
1. The summary of the facts charged was on October 1, 2016, the Defendant: (a) driven a car (vehicle number: C; hereinafter “Defendant’s vehicle”) in the direction of Taeju-si in Gyeonggi-si (IC) in order to turn to the left in violation of the signal at the intersection at the Gari-si, Gyeonggi-si; (b) and was under control by the guard E of the Guri Police Station D where traffic control in the vicinity, and was in possession of E, and was demanded to sign on the right of the PDA or a portable signal.
Therefore, although the Defendant requested E to “I am high without given marks,” the Defendant refused this, and the Defendant was flickly flicked the Defendant’s vehicle while driving the Defendant vehicle, while the vehicle was flickly flicked in the vehicle, while the vehicle was flicked.
At the time of subsection (a) the desire of “brut brut”, “brut brut”, etc., and this falls from the floor of E, and the head of E, which is written with the head of the Defendant’s vehicle while waiting for the patrol vehicle requested for support without returning it to the top of the Defendant’s vehicle, is not developed because there is a police police such as brut.
Terrorism, such as "bruth like brus and police brus", and committing acts threatening to drinking, and threatened E.
Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on traffic control.
2. The Defendant asserts that there is no fact that the police officer, at the time, expressed that there was no danger that the Defendant, who was a traffic control police officer, would take a bath or attempt to take a drinking.
A statement submitted by E, a traffic control police officer, to the police officer in charge of traffic control and directly admitted evidence corresponding to the facts charged that the defendant attempted to threaten drinking, is only a witness or a black image (such as a witness or black image).